Líder do Partido Trabalhista da Grã-Bretanha, Jeremy Corbyn, em fala realizada na sede do Conselho de Direitos Humanos da ONU defende claramente a aprovação de um tratado internacional sobre Empresas e Direitos Humanos.

Em sua fala proferida no último dia 08 de dezembro, em Genebra, Corbyn tratou da saída do Reino Unido da União Europeia a partir de um referendo conduzido no ano passado, e o futuro da cooperação britânica em matéria de direitos humanos pós-Brexit, declarando que seu partido “(…) continuará a trabalhar com outros Estados europeus e partidos e movimentos progressistas, através do Conselho Europeu para garantir que nosso país e outros países preservem suas obrigações internacionais”. (Tradução nossa)


Em seu discurso, o líder britânico ainda afirmou a necessidade urgente de se trabalhar através da cooperação internacional, da solidariedade, e da ação coletiva com outros países de maneira a avançar a causa dos direitos humanos e confrontar as quatro maiores e interconectadas ameaças que a humanidade enfrenta. A primeira dessas ameaças destacadas por Corbyn é justamente uma concentração crescente de riqueza e poder nas mãos de uma minúscula elite corporativa através um sistema econômico global “comumente chamado de neoliberalismo”, que “acentuou drasticamente a desigualdade marginalização, insegurança e raiva ao redor do mundo”. Corbyn denunciou o nível de desigualdade dentro e entre as nações do mundo, chamando atenção para o fato que 1 trilhão de dólares por ano são sugados do Sul Global através de fluxos financeiros ilícitos, o que ele denominou de escândalo global.



Jeremy Corbyn relembrou ainda o discurso do ex-presidente do Chile Salvador Allende proferido em 4 de dezembro de 1972 na Assembleia Geral da ONU em Nova York, um discurso que pediu por uma “ação global contra a ameaça das corporações transnacionais que não respondem a nenhum Estado, parlamento ou organização que represente um interesse comum.”


Em seguida declarou: “É por isso que me comprometo a vocês hoje, que o próximo governo do Partido Trabalhador na Grã-Bretanha apoiara ativamente os esforços do Conselho de Direitos Humanos da ONU em criar um tratado internacional vinculante para regular corporações transnacionais sob a égide do direito internacional dos direitos humanos.”


Veja a fala completa dele (em inglês), abaixo.

“Speaking at the United Nation’s Geneva headquarters today, Jeremy Corbyn MP, Leader of the Labour Party, said:

Thank you Paul for that introduction.

And let me give a special thanks to the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

Your work gives an important platform to marginalised voices for social justice to challenge policy makers and campaign for change.

I welcome pressure both on my party the British Labour Party and on my leadership to put social justice front and centre stage in everything we do.

So thank you for inviting me to speak here in this historic setting at the Palais des Nations in Geneva a city that has been a place of refuge and philosophy since the time of Rousseau.

The headquarters before the Second World War of the ill-fated League of Nations, which now houses the United Nations.

It’s a particular privilege to be speaking here because the constitution of our party includes a commitment to support the United Nations. A promise “to secure peace, freedom, democracy, economic security and environmental protection for all”.

I’d also like to thank my fellow panellists, Arancha Gonzalez and Nikhil Seth, and Labour’s Shadow Attorney General, Shami Chakrabarti, who has accompanied me here.

She has been a remarkable campaigner and a great asset to the international movement for human rights.

And lastly let me thank you all for being here today.

I would like to use this opportunity in the run- up to International Human Rights Day to focus on the greatest threats to our common humanity.

And why states need to throw their weight behind genuine international cooperation and human rights both individual and collective, social and economic, as well as legal and constitutional at home and abroad if we are to meet and overcome those threats.

My own country is at a crossroads. The decision by the British people to leave the European Union in last year’s referendum means we have to rethink our role in the world.

Some want to use Brexit to turn Britain in on itself, rejecting the outside world, viewing everyone as a feared competitor.

Others want to use Brexit to put rocket boosters under our current economic system’s insecurities and inequalities, turning Britain into a deregulated corporate tax haven, with low wages, limited rights, and cut-price public services in a destructive race to the bottom.

My party stands for a completely different future when we leave the EU, drawing on the best internationalist traditions of the labour movement and our country.

We want to see close and cooperative relationships with our European neighbours, outside the EU, based on solidarity as well as mutual benefit and fair trade, along with a wider proactive internationalism across the globe.

We are proud that Britain was an original signatory to the European Convention of Human Rights and our 1998 Human Rights Act enshrined it in our law.

So Labour will continue to work with other European states and progressive parties and movements, through the Council of Europe to ensure our country and others uphold our international obligations.

Just as the work of the UN Human Rights Council helps to ensure countries like ours live up to our commitments, such as on disability rights, where this year’s report found us to be failing.

International cooperation, solidarity, collective action are the values we are determined to project in our foreign policy.

Those values will inform everything the next Labour government does on the world stage, using diplomacy to expand a progressive, rules-based international system, which provides justice and security for all.

They must be genuinely universal and apply to the strong as much as the weak if they are to command global support and confidence.

They cannot be used to discipline the weak, while the strong do as they please, or they will be discredited as a tool of power, not justice.

That’s why we must ensure that the powerful uphold and respect international rules and international law.

If we don’t, the ideals of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 will remain an aspiration, rather than a reality and international rules will be seen as a pick and mix menu for the global powers that call the international shots.

Most urgently we must work with other countries to advance the cause of human rights, to confront the four greatest and interconnected threats facing our common humanity.

First, the growing concentration of unaccountable wealth and power in the hands of a tiny corporate elite, a system many call neoliberalism, which has sharply increased inequality, marginalisation, insecurity and anger across the world.

Second, climate change, which is creating instability, fuelling conflict across the world and threatening all our futures.

Third, the unprecedented numbers of people fleeing conflict, persecution, human rights abuses, social breakdown and climate disasters.

And finally, the use of unilateral military action and intervention, rather than diplomacy and negotiation, to resolve disputes and change governments.

The dominant global economic system is broken.

It is producing a world where a wealthy few control 90 percent of global resources.

Of growing insecurity and grotesque levels of inequality within and between nations, where more than 100 billion dollars a year are estimated to be lost to developing countries from corporate tax avoidance.

Where $1 trillion dollars a year are sucked out of the Global South through illicit financial flows.

This is a global scandal.

The most powerful international corporations must not be allowed to continue to dictate how and for whom our world is run.

Thirty years after structural adjustment programmes first ravaged so much of the world, and a decade after the financial crash of 2008, the neoliberal orthodoxy that delivered them is breaking down.

This moment, a crisis of confidence in a bankrupt economic system and social order, presents us with a once in a generation opportunity to build a new economic and social consensus which puts the interests of the majority first.

But the crumbling of the global elite’s system and their prerogative to call the shots unchallenged has led some politicians to stoke fear and division. And deride international cooperation as national capitulation.

President Trump’s disgraceful Muslim ban and his anti-Mexican rhetoric have fuelled racist incitement and misogyny and shift the focus away from what his Wall Street-dominated administration is actually doing.

In Britain, where wages have actually fallen for most people over the last decade as the corporations and the richest have been handed billions in tax cuts, our Prime Minister has followed a less extreme approach but one that also aims to divert attention from her Government’s failures and real agenda.

She threatens to scrap the Human Rights Act, which guarantees all of our people’s civil and political rights and has actually benefited everyone in our country. And she has insisted “if you believe you’re a citizen of the world, you’re a citizen of nowhere”.

There is an alternative to this damaging and bankrupt order. The world’s largest corporations and banks cannot be left to write the rules and rig the system for themselves.

The world’s economy can and must deliver for the common good and the majority of its people. But that is going to demand real and fundamental structural change on an international level.

The UN has a pivotal role to play, in advancing a new consensus and common ground based on solidarity, respect for human rights and international regulation and cooperation.

That includes as a platform for democratic leaders to speak truth about unaccountable power.

One such moment took place on 4 December 1972, when President Salvador Allende of Chile, elected despite huge opposition and US interference, took the rostrum of the UN General Assembly in New York.

He called for global action against the threat from transnational corporations, that do not answer to any state, any parliament or any organisation representing the common interest.

Nine months later, Allende was killed in General Augusto Pinochet’s coup, which ushered in a brutal 17-year dictatorship and turned Chile into a laboratory of free market fundamentalism.

But 44 years on, all over the world people are standing up and saying enough to the unchained power of multinational companies to dodge taxes, grab land and resources on the cheap and rip the heart out of workforces and communities.

That’s why I make the commitment to you today that the next Labour government in Britain will actively support the efforts of the UN Human Rights Council to create a legally binding treaty to regulate transnational corporations under international human rights law.

Genuine corporate accountability must apply to all of the activities of their subsidiaries and suppliers.

Impunity for corporations that violate human rights or wreck our environment, as in the mineral-driven conflicts in the Democratic Republic of Congo, must be brought to an end.

For too long, development has been driven by the unfounded dogma that unfettered markets and unaccountable multinational companies are the key to solving global problems.

So under the next Labour Government the Department for International Development will have the twin mission of not only eradicating poverty but also reducing inequality across the world.

To achieve this goal we must act against the global scandal of tax dodging and trade mis-invoicing – robbing developing countries and draining resources from our own public services.

In Africa alone an estimated 35 billion dollars is lost each year to tax dodging, and 50 billion to illicit financial flows, vastly exceeding the 30 billion dollars that enters the continent as aid.

As the Paradise and Panama Papers have shown the super-rich and the powerful can’t be trusted to regulate themselves.

Multinational companies must be required to undertake country-by-country reporting, while countries in the Global South need support now to keep hold of the billions being stolen from their people.

So the next Labour government will seek to work with tax authorities in developing countries, as Zambia has with NORAD – the Norwegian aid agency – to help them stop the looting.

Tomorrow is International Anti-Corruption Day. Corruption isn’t something that happens ‘over there’. Our government has played a central role in enabling the corruption that undermines democracy and violates human rights. It is a global issue that requires a global response.

When people are kept in poverty, while politicians funnel public funds into tax havens, that is corruption, and a Labour government will act decisively on tax havens: introducing strict standards of transparency for crown dependencies and overseas territories including a public register of owners, directors, major shareholders and beneficial owners … for all companies and trusts.

Climate change is the second great threat to our common humanity. Our planet is in jeopardy. Global warming is undeniable; the number of natural disasters has quadrupled since 1970.

Hurricanes like the ones that recently hit the Caribbean are bigger because they are absorbing moisture from warmer seas.

It is climate change that is warming the seas, mainly caused by emissions from the world’s richer countries.

And yet the least polluting countries, more often than not the developing nations, are at the sharp end of the havoc climate change unleashes – with environmental damage fuelling food insecurity and social dislocation.

We must stand with them in solidarity. Two months ago, I promised the Prime Minister of Antigua and Barbuda, Gaston Browne, that I would use this platform to make this message clear.

The international community must mobilise resources and the world’s biggest polluters shoulder the biggest burden.

So I ask governments in the most polluting countries, including in the UK:

First, to expand their capacity to respond to disasters around the world. Our armed forces, some of the best trained and most highly skilled in the world, should be allowed to use their experience to respond to humanitarian emergencies. Italy is among those leading the way with its navy becoming a more versatile and multi-role force.

Second, to factor the costs of environmental degradation into financial forecasting as Labour has pledged to do with Britain’s Office of Budget Responsibility.

Third, to stand very firmly behind the historic Paris Climate Accords.

And finally, take serious and urgent steps on debt relief and cancellation.

We need to act as an international community against the injustice of countries trying to recover from climate crises they did not create while struggling to repay international debts.

It’s worth remembering the words of Thomas Sankara, President of Burkina Faso, delivered to the Organisation of African Unity in 1987 a few months before he too was assassinated in a coup.

“The debt cannot be repaid“ he said, “first because if we don’t repay lenders will not die. But if we repay… we are going to die.”

The growing climate crisis exacerbates the already unparalleled numbers of people escaping conflict and desperation.

There are now more refugees and displaced people around the world than at any time since the Second World War.

Refugees are people like us.

But unlike us they have been forced by violence, persecution and climate chaos to flee their homes.

One of the biggest moral tests of our time is how we live up to the spirit and letter of the 1951 Refugee Convention.

Its core principle was simple: to protect refugees.

Yet ten countries, which account for just 2.5 percent of the global economy, are hosting more than half the world’s refugees.

It is time for the world’s richer countries to step up and show our common humanity.

Failure means millions of Syrians internally displaced within their destroyed homeland or refugees outside it. Rohingya refugees returned to Myanmar without guarantees of citizenship or protection from state violence and refugees held in indefinite detention in camps unfit for human habitation as in Papua New Guinea or Nauru. And African refugees sold into slavery in war-ravaged Libya.

This reality should offend our sense of humanity and human solidarity.

European countries can, and must, do more as the death rate of migrants and refugees crossing the Mediterranean continues to rise.

And we need to take more effective action against human traffickers.

But let us be clear: the long-term answer is genuine international cooperation based on human rights, which confronts the root causes of conflict, persecution and inequality.

I’ve spent most of my life, with many others, making the case for diplomacy and dialogue… over war and conflict, often in the face of hostility.

But I remain convinced that is the only way to deliver genuine and lasting security for all.

And even after the disastrous invasions and occupations of recent years there is again renewed pressure to opt for military force, America First or Empire 2.0 as the path to global security.

I know the people of Britain are neither insensitive to the sufferings of others nor blind to the impact and blowback from our country’s reckless foreign wars.

Regime change wars, invasions, interventions and occupations in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya and Somalia have failed on their own terms, devastated the countries and regions and made Britain and the world a more dangerous place.

And while the UK government champions some human rights issues on others it is silent, if not complicit, in their violation.

Too many have turned a wilfully blind eye to the flagrant and large-scale human rights abuses now taking place in Yemen, fuelled by arms sales to Saudi Arabia worth billions of pounds.

The see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil approach undermines our credibility and ability to act over other human rights abuses.

Total British government aid to Yemen last year was under £150 million – less than the profits made by British arms companies selling weapons to Saudi Arabia. What does that say about our country’s priorities, or our government’s role in the humanitarian disaster now gripping Yemen?

Our credibility to speak out against the ethnic cleansing of Rohingya Muslims is severely undermined when the British Government has been providing support to Myanmar’s military.

And our Governments pay lip service to a comprehensive settlement and two state solution to the Israel- Palestine conflict but do nothing to use the leverage they have to end the oppression and dispossession of the Palestinian people.

70 years after the UN General Assembly voted to create a Palestinian state alongside what would become Israel, and half a century since Israel occupied the whole of historic Palestine, they should take a lead from Israeli peace campaigners such as Gush Shalom and Peace Now and demand an end to the multiple human rights abuses Palestinians face on a daily basis. The continued occupation and illegal settlements are violations of international law and are a barrier to peace.

The US president’s announcement that his administration will recognise Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, including occupied Palestinian territory, is a threat to peace that has rightly been met with overwhelming international condemnation.

The decision is not only reckless and provocative – it risks setting back any prospect of a political settlement of the Israel-Palestine conflict.

President Trump’s speech at the UN General Assembly in September signalled a wider threat to peace. His attack on multilateralism, human rights and international law should deeply trouble us all.

And this is no time to reject the Iran Nuclear Deal, a significant achievement agreed between Iran and a group of world power to reduce tensions.

That threatens not just the Middle East but also the Korean Peninsula. What incentives are there for Pyongyang to believe disarmament will bring benefits when the US dumps its nuclear agreement with Tehran?

Trump and Kim Jong-un threaten a terrifying nuclear confrontation with their absurd and bellicose insults.

In common with almost the whole of humanity, I say to the two leaders: this is not a game, step back from the brink now.

It is a commonplace that war and violence do not solve the world’s problems. Violence breeds violence. In 2016 nearly three quarters of all deaths from terrorism were in five states; Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Nigeria and Somalia.

So let us stand up for the victims of war and terrorism and make international justice a reality.

And demand that the biggest arms exporters ensure all arms exports are consistent, not legally, but with their moral obligations too.

That means no more arms export licences when there is a clear risk that they will be used to commit human rights abuses or crimes against humanity.

The UK is one of the world’s largest arms exporters so we must live up to our international obligations while we explore ways to convert arms production into other socially useful, high-skill, high-tech industry.

Which is why I welcome the recent bipartisan U.S. House of Representatives resolution which does two unprecedented things.

First, it acknowledges the U.S. role in the destruction of Yemen, including the mid-air refuelling of the Saudi-led coalition planes essential to their bombing campaign and helping in selecting targets.

Second, it makes plain that Congress has not authorised this military involvement.

Yemen is a desperate humanitarian catastrophe with the worst cholera outbreak in history.

The weight of international community opinion needs to be brought to bear on those supporting Saudi Arabia’s war in Yemen, including Theresa May’s Government, to meet our legal and moral obligations on arms sales and to negotiate an urgent ceasefire and settlement of this devastating conflict.

If we’re serious about supporting peace we must strengthen international cooperation and peacekeeping.  Britain has an important role to play after failing to contribute significant troop numbers in recent years.

We are determined to seize the opportunity to be a force for good in peacekeeping, diplomacy and support for human rights.

Labour is committed to invest in our diplomatic capabilities and consular services and we will reintroduce human rights advisers in our embassies around the world.

Human rights and justice will be at the heart of our foreign policy along with a commitment to support the United Nations.

The UN provides a unique platform for international cooperation and action. And to be effective, we need member states to get behind the reform agenda set out by Secretary General Guterres.

The world demands the UN Security Council responds, becomes more representative and plays the role it was set up to on peace and security.

We can live in a more peaceful world. The desire to help create a better life for all burns within us.

Governments, civil society, social movements and international organisations can all help realise that goal.

We need to redouble our efforts to create a global rules based system that applies to all and works for the many, not the few.

No more bomb first and think and talk later.

No more double standards in foreign policy.

No more scapegoating of global institutions for the sake of scoring political points at home.

Instead: solidarity, calm leadership and cooperation. Together we can:

Build a new social and economic system with human rights and justice at its core.

Deliver climate justice and a better way to live together on this planet.

Recognise the humanity of refugees and offer them a place of safety.

Work for peace, security and understanding.

The survival of our common humanity requires nothing less.

We need to recognise and pay tribute to human rights defenders the world over, putting their lives on the line for others – our voice must be their voice.”


Homa e outros centros acadêmicos, como GEPSA, Organon e PoEMAS, protocolam pedido de ingresso como Amici Curiae na ação civil pública dos 155 bilhões, sobre o maior crime ambiental da história do Brasil, ocorrido na Bacia do Rio Doce

Amici curiae, expressão latina que significa “amigos da corte”, são terceiros que ingressam no processo para fornecerem subsídios ao órgão jurisdicional para o julgamento da causa. Essa intervenção é possível em qualquer processo de relevância, com tema muito específico ou que tenha repercussão social. As pessoas ou entidades que desejam se valer dessa figura processual devem demonstrar algum vínculo com a matéria tratada no processo, sendo capazes de contribuir para sua solução e, assim, auxiliar a Justiça a tomar a decisão mais justa. Para tanto, os amici curiae oferecem esclarecimentos sobre questões essenciais à matéria discutida, sustentando posicionamentos em defesa de interesses que poderão ser atingidos com a sentença.



Procurador Federal dos Direitos do Cidação Adjunto, Dr. Marlon Weichert, aponta necessidade de se questionar políticas públicas que representem apenas a implementação de dinâmicas e marcos normativos voluntários para a responsabilização de empresas por violações de Direitos Humanos

Ocorreu, no dia 08 de novembro na Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, a primeira Audiência Pública brasileira sobre Direitos Humanos e Empresas, organizada pelo Grupo de Trabalho Direitos Humanos e Empresas da PFDC e pelo GT Corporações, que reúne diversas organizações da sociedade civil, dentre elas o Homa. No encerramento do evento, o coordenador do Grupo de Trabalho Direitos Humanos e Empresas, Dr. Marlon Alberto Weichert, Procurador Federal dos Direitos do Cidadão Adjunto , já apontou para a necessidade, amplamente discutida na Audiência, de se questionar políticas públicas que representem apenas a implementação de dinâmicas e marcos normativos voluntários para a responsabilização de empresas por violações de Direitos Humanos.

No Conselho de Direitos Humanos da ONU, side event da Campanha “Dismantle Corporate Power and Stop Impunity” apresenta proposta de um tratado internacional sobre empresas e direitos humanos.

A Campanha “Dismantle Corporate Power and Stop Impunity” apresentou proposta para um tratado internacional sobre empresas e direitos humanos em side event no Conselho de Direitos Humanos das Nações Unidas, em Genebra no dia 25 de outubro, enquanto ocorria a 3ª Sessão do Grupo de Trabalho Intergovernamental para Elaboração de um Instrumento Internacional Vinculante sobre Empresas Transnacionais e Outros Negócios com Respeito a Direitos Humanos. Na ocasião, integrantes de diversas entidades da sociedade civil apresentaram pontos acerca da proposta.

Confira abaixo a fala da Profª. Manoela Roland, coordenadora do Homa, na apresentação:


Professora Dra. Manoela Carneiro Roland, coordenadora do Homa- Centro de Direitos Humanos e Empresas da UFJF, está confirmada como especialista convidada oficial da 3ª Sessão do “Grupo de Trabalho Intergovernamental para Elaboração de um Instrumento Internacional Vinculante sobre Empresas Transnacionais e Outros Negócios com Respeito a Direitos Humanos” na ONU, amanhã dia 24 de outubro.

A 3ª Sessão do Grupo de Trabalho Intergovernamental para Elaboração de um Instrumento Internacional Vinculante sobre Empresas Transnacionais e Outros Negócios com Respeito a Direitos Humanos se iniciou hoje, dia 23 de outubro, no Palácio das Nações, em Genebra – Suíça, e se encerrará no dia 27.

Esta sessão estabelece uma continuidade em relação às duas anteriores, ocorridas nos anos de 2015 e 2016, sendo a primeira a discutir especificamente os elementos do mencionado tratado.

A participação da Professora Doutora Manoela Carneiro Roland, tratará do escopo de aplicação do instrumento, no que concerne ao âmbito de direitos protegidos, às atividades e aos atores sujeitos a aplicação do tratado. O painel será transmitido pela United Nations TV (UNTV).

O Homa – Centro de Direitos Humanos e Empresas teve início em 2012 na Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora e possui o apoio da Fundação Ford. O grupo, coordenado pela Professora Adjunta da Faculdade de Direito da UFJF, Manoela Roland, desenvolve pesquisas teóricas e empíricas sobre diversas temáticas relacionadas à área Direitos Humanos e Empresas.


Tema de Direitos Humanos e Empresas ganha destaque na Faculdade de Direito da USP

O HOMA – Centro de Direitos Humanos e Empresas realizou durante os dias 23 a 25 de agosto de 2017 o IV Seminário Internacional de Direitos Humanos e Empresas na Faculdade de Direito da USP, em São Paulo. Durante o evento, que contou com uma larga participação da sociedade civil, por volta de 30 pesquisadores de mais de 20 instituições acadêmicas, dentre elas PUC-SP, UFBA, Unisinos, UniCEUB, UERJ, UFOP e UFRJ, e da sociedade civil, provenientes de países como Equador, Suíça, Uruguai, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Colômbia, Argentina e Espanha, apresentaram palestras sobre temas que versaram desde a discussões gerais e teóricas sobre o tema de direitos humanos e empresas, a discussões mais pautadas numa realidade prática, como é o caso da discussão acerca do processo de elaboração de um Tratado vinculante sobre a matéria, processo esse que se encontra em um momento histórico inédito. Isso porque ocorrerá no final deste mês de outubro a Terceira Sessão Intergovernamental de Negociação do Tratado sobre Empresas e Direitos Humanos, quando a representação do Equador, que preside o Grupo Intergovernamental, tem a incumbência, conforme a Res.26/9 do Conselho de Direitos Humanos da ONU, de apresentar um documento com elementos para o instrumento vinculante, inaugurando, portanto, uma nova fase em que se espera uma maior envolvimento ou resistência dos Estados e demais atores internacionais ao processo. Ou seja, a agenda em torno do tratado será uma realidade concreta que colocará à prova a capacidade de incidência qualificada da sociedade civil organizada, e de centros de pesquisa, a fim de expressar os anseios históricos de afetados e afetadas por violações de Direitos Humanos cometidas por empresas transnacionais, protegidas, até então, pelo marco de normas eminentemente não vinculantes.

Neste sentido, a presença do Embaixador do Equador, Guillaume Jean Sebastien Long, e do Ministro na Missão Permanente do Equador em Genebra, Luís Espinosa-Salas foi de grande importância no seminário, enriquecendo enormemente esse debate. Ademais, a participação de pesquisadoras e pesquisadores provenientes da América Latina contribuíram para a partilha de ideias e experiências comuns a fim de permitir a construção de uma maior identidade latino-americana na luta contra a impunidade das empresas transnacionais que violam direitos humanos a partir do que é denominado de “arquitetura da impunidade”.

Desta forma, é com grande felicidade que IV Seminário pensado como mais um espaço cuja prioridade era reunir atores sociais e acadêmicos envolvidos neste campo, na América Latina, foi capaz de atrair mais parceiros a fim de que nos preparemos, tanto para a Terceira Sessão Intergovernamental de Negociação do Tratado, como para que possamos refletir sobre mecanismos a longo prazo capazes de oferecerem algumas alternativas de enfrentamento ao cenário político regional. Houve grande sucesso em proporcionar uma discussão sobre a necessidade de se reverter a chamada “lógica estadocêntrica” do Direito Internacional, abrindo-se terreno para o que aqui se denomina de um Direito “De baixo para cima”, isto é, um Direito construído a partir do diálogo com a sociedade, capaz de representar também o anseio dos Povos.




Manoela Roland e Daniel Aragão, coordenadora e pesquisador associado do Homa, escrevem artigo que comporá livro organizado por Surya Deva e David Bilchitz

Professora Manoela Roland , coordenadora do Homa, e professor Daniel Aragão – UFBA -, pesquisador associado ao Homa, escrevem artigo que comporá o livro organizado pelo professor Surya Deva e pelo professor David Bilchitz, publicado pela Cambridge University Press. O lançamento ocorrerá durante a Terceira Sessão Intergovernamental de Negociação do Tratado Internacional sobre Empresas e Direitos Humanos, no Conselho de Direitos Humanos da ONU, em Genebra.

Confira o flyer:


Coordenadora do Homa concede entrevista à Televisión Nacional Uruguay

No dia 28 de agosto, a professora Manoela Roland, Coordenadora do Homa, concedeu, no Uruguai, entrevista à jornalista Ana Maria Mizrahi, da Televisión Nacional Uruguay – TNU. O assunto abordado foi o processo de negociação de um tratado internacional sobre empresas e direitos humanos, além da Doutrina do Choque de austeridade e flexibilização trabalhista no Brasil.

Homa lança estudo que destaca a necessidade de priorizar-se a perspectiva das vítimas e a verdadeira lógica dos Direitos Humanos, na reparação de suas violações em grandes empreendimentos

Homa lança estudo que destaca a necessidade de priorizar-se a perspectiva das vítimas e a verdadeira lógica dos Direitos Humanos, na reparação de suas violações em grandes empreendimentos, a partir de sua pesquisa sobre o caso do Complexo portuário do Açu/RJ.

“Ou as empresas assumem os seus erros e pagam por eles ou a Asprim
vai continuar a gritar e lutar pela retomada das terras do Açu.
“Dez anos de implantação do complexo industrial do Açu, desapropriações arbitrárias, salinização das terras de agricultura familiar, saga do gado, mar que avança no território do Açu, degradação ambiental e social, continuidade nas violações dos direitos humanos e na violência. ”
“Tentaram nos enterrar esqueceram que somos sementes!!!””

Dona Noêmia Magalhães
membro da Asprim

Homa divulga Dissertação sobre a tensão entre Direitos Humanos e Desenvolvimento

O HOMA – Centro de Direitos Humanos e Empresas divulga Dissertação de Mestrado de seu Pesquisador Associado, Felipe Fayer Mansoldo, Professor Substituto de Direito Processual Civil da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora.

Construída sob a orientação da Professora Manoela Carneiro Roland, Coordenadora do HOMA, a partir de uma pesquisa desenvolvida em parceria com o ECOPOL, grupo de pesquisa em Ciência Política da UNIRIO, coordenado pelo Professor João Roberto Silva Pinto, bem como da Professora de Direito Empresarial Sílvia Marina Pinheiro, da FGV-RJ, a dissertação segue a abordagem teórica de Nicos Poulantzas sobre o Estado e procura analisar o histórico papel do BNDES enquanto aparelho econômico responsável por reforçar a problemática relação entre desenvolvimento e Direitos Humanos, dada a centralidade da instituição no modelo de financiamento aos grandes empreendimentos no Brasil.

São abordadas as principais dificuldades em assegurar a proteção efetiva aos Direitos Humanos por meio dos mecanismos de governança do banco, bem como as fragilidades institucionais exploradas pelo poder corporativo. O trabalho também destaca a existência de duas ações civis públicas em trâmite na Justiça Federal – Seção Judiciária do Espírito Santo versando sobre fraude na legitimação de terras públicas em que são réus o BNDES, a Fibria Celulose S.A. (sucessora da antiga Aracruz Celulose) e o Estado do Espírito Santo. Os terrenos, localizados nos municípios de Conceição da Barra e São Mateus, são reivindicados por quilombolas, que ocupavam a região nos termos do Estudo e Relatório de Impactos em Direitos Humanos de Grandes Projetos, conduzido pelo Centro de Defesa dos Direitos Humanos da Serra.